Your Thoughts Exactly: Down in the Boondocks

Thursday, December 29, 2005

 

Down in the Boondocks


December 31, 2005
marks the end of a year that can’t end soon enough. It also marks the tenth anniversary of the last Calvin and Hobbes comic strip, which has been celebrated by the release of the beautiful leather-bound collection of all Calvin and Hobbes strips in two giant volumes. I have yet to buy these books because I lack disposable income, and because I already have every Calvin and Hobbes strip in my collection, although many of these strips are in books that have spent years on my bathroom floor.

I think that Calvin and Hobbes probably shaped my sense of humor more than any other source material. Calvin, the main character, can be gross, sarcastic, satirical, mean, and of course, a numbskull. His relationships, most importantly with Hobbes, but also with his parents, are not boxed into one type of interaction as most characters are portrayed on sitcoms, in movies, and in comic strips. Bill Waterson was able to use the comics’ daily format to mirror real life, in that you interact with people differently on different days. So some moments Calvin can be deep and philosophical and some moments he can be banging nails into his mother’s coffee table.

Since the Calvin and Hobbes ended, the Comics page in the Boston Globe has not been the same. Nothing has filled the void; to the point where ten years after the fact, the Globe has begun to run old C+H strips. I am not opposed to this at all, as there is an entire generation of ten year olds that can have their senses of humor and outlooks on life improved by this resource. But it would be nice if some new comic could come along, inspired by Waterson to carry the mantle.

The closest any strip has come to doing this is Aaron McGruder’s the Boondocks, in its early years of existence. In The Boondocks, McGruder was able to replicate the depth of relationships between the strips’ characters, although the characters in The Boondocks were very different than those in C+H. First, he split his protagonist into two different characters, the good: Huey, smart and philosophical, and the bad: Riley, troublemaker. Both are descendents of Calvin and both share his anti-authoritarianism. Second, he had a deeper stable of supporting characters: Grandpa, Caesar, Jasmin and her parents, Cindy, Huey and Riley’s teachers (one of whom is named Ms. Peterson, after one of the parents of Taylor James Peterson.)

Third, the premise, urban youths move to suburbia, allowed McGruder to examine an issue Waterston never covered in his strips: racial relations in the U.S. Sometimes McGruder’s characterizations seem a little over-the-top, particularly his characterization of Cindy, a young white girl who goes out of her way to impress Huey of his knowledge of black culture, thus coming across as totally naïve. In general though, McGruder was able to infuse the racial background of the Freeman family into the relationships of the strip in a realistic, and of course humorous, manner. Plus he made lots of hip hop references which I adored.

Following 9/11 the content of the strip changed, however. McGruder addresses this, saying that he was unable to continue the strip in its past format, even if it was a format that everyone liked. To avoid burnout, he stripped down the number of characters and changed the strips focus, from emphasizing the relationships forged between members of different races living in suburbia to emphasizing Huey’s take on current events. This had the dual effect of limiting the breadth and potential of the strip and garnering The Boondocks more attention. In the hyper-patriotic atmosphere of 9/11 The Boondocks was one of the only voices speaking out against suspect legislation like the PATRIOT Act and questioning the motives and competence of the Bush Administration. What followed was a TV deal for The Boondocks cartoon as part of Adult Swim and of course, increased fame for McGruder, who began to brand himself as one of “America’s angriest black men.”

The Boondocks TV show has grown out of the second incarnation of The Boondocks comic strip. The show looks at one issue per week, (the R Kelly trial, golddiggers,) and while the half hour TV slot allows the show to put the issue into a greater context than a comic strip, the lack of continuity and development of characters still hinders the show's potential. In choosing to label himself the angry black man, McGruder has limited his characters’ ability to grow and develop into something else. Of course there is a lot to be angry about, and Huey Freeman will always be a rebel and always be looking to give it to the man. But in its older format, Huey had the potential to give it to the man and at the same time grow and learn to live with these crazy white people around him, and to make his own mistakes based on his prejudices. As all people do.

I hope on this tenth anniversary of the ending of Calvin and Hobbes, McGruder can go back and read into Calvin’s nature, his complexity, and attempt to apply this same complexity to his characters. Nothing will ever replace Calvin and Hobbes. But there is much we can still learn from it even ten years later.


Comments:
I remember the first day 'The Boondocks' was carried in the Chicago Tribune. They had a little article talking about McGruder and how it could be the new Calvin and Hobbes- even talking about how much McGruder is a fan of Calvin and Hobbes.

I had pretty high hopes- and the Boondocks started off well, probably garnering the 'best comic strip out there' award just for being relatively smart as well as funny. (Also, because of the Far Side's demise, there weren't very many other contenders) But for a character-driven strip it stood by itself, it was willing to take risks, and it didn't TRY to be the 'new calvin and hobbes', which I think he feared being labeled as and I think he purposely avoids Calvin and Hobbes' preachiness and philosophy to avoid this.

Over the years, though, as Marmar points out, the strip got angry, and repetitive. The angry black man identity, which seems to be selling books and articles in all media (see Stephen A. Smith or Scoop Jackson, or Ralph Wiley) is just very predictable. You knew that McGruder was going to milk Katrina, R Kelly jokes, etc. for all they were worth, to the point where you could probably guess what jokes were going to be in the paper in two weeks (about how long a lead time they have to create new strips) Just like you knew that Michael Moore was going to make a point that Bush handled it incompetently.

Which isn't to say this isn't necessary. Because a funny thing happened this year, after I had stopped reading the Boondocks. I leafed through the comic pages and web sites to try and find something to replace the awfulness that Fox Trot has become (it used to be a pretty funny look at family life) and Non Sequitur (an extremely repetitive and preachy liberal strip). It turns out that the Boondocks has beccome one of the better political strips out there. I had wanted a new Calvin and Hobbes, but instead we got a funnier version Doonesbury.

But even that classification falls a bit short. Calvin and Hobbes is art- as much art as could be milked out of the 1990's comic strip format, and even though I sometimes disagreed with the message that Watterson creates, you couldn't deny that he was displaying it well. And Doonesbury is and will probably be remembered as the most important political series of all time. I don't see the Boondocks as being as timeless as either. Those are just the realities of covering current events, methinks.

As for the 10 year anniversary of Calvin and Hobbes, it's too bad, but at least Watterson had the good sense to hang it up when he was still doing relatively well, not like a certain other series that I used to be a fan of...
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?